Culture changed on paper. Behaviour hasn't.
- Andrew Pigott
- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
The launch goes well. The chief executive opens the all-staff event with a clear message about the kind of organisation they need to become. The new values are introduced: collaborative, resident-focused, inclusive, accountable. They are well-chosen words. They describe something most people in the room would genuinely want to work toward.
The follow-through is thorough. Town halls, intranet articles, leadership messages, a manager toolkit, a behaviour framework, lanyards with the values printed on them. Several months of visible effort and investment.
Then the annual staff survey comes back.
Engagement has not shifted. Trust in leadership is flat. Staff still say decisions are unclear, information is held tightly, and difficult conversations are avoided. The survey still points to hesitation about raising concerns with senior management. The comments section reads much as it did before.
The values are on the wall. The work feels the same.
The tempting explanation
The first instinct is usually to look at communication. Did we explain it clearly enough? Did leaders carry the message consistently? Do staff need more time?
These are reasonable questions but they tend to locate the problem in the wrong place. Most staff who have been through a values launch can say what the values are. Many of them agree with the intent. The problem is not that people have failed to understand the new culture. It is that the organisation has changed the language of culture before changing the conditions that carry it.
People are not behaving according to the poster. They are behaving according to what the organisation keeps teaching them, through everyday experience, is normal, safe and rewarded.
Often, that is not cynicism. It is a rational response to the signals people are receiving.
When a values statement points in one direction and everyday consequences point in another, people tend to follow the consequences. What looks like resistance, indifference or values-washing is sometimes none of those things. It is people reading the organisation accurately.
Declared culture and reinforced culture
There is a distinction between what an organisation says it values and what it actually reinforces through the way work happens.
Longstanding research on organisational culture points to the same basic pattern: people learn what matters from what leaders consistently notice, measure, reward and tolerate. When stated values conflict with everyday mechanisms, the mechanisms win.
The CIPD makes this more practical by distinguishing broad organisational culture from organisational climate: the meaning and behaviour people experience through policies, practices, management responses and the way decisions are made. Culture can be difficult to define and change as a whole. Climate is more observable. It appears in how meetings are run, how managers respond when something goes wrong, who gets promoted, and what happens when somebody challenges the accepted way of working.
This does not mean leaders are hypocritical or staff are cynical. People are learning what the organisation is genuinely asking of them, not from the values statement, but from what happens when they act on it.
A pattern from a county council
A county council has come through a difficult period: a major restructure, rising demand, sustained budget pressure and a staff survey that made uncomfortable reading. It invests in a culture refresh, working with staff to develop values and a behaviour framework that genuinely reflect what people said they wanted.
The words are good. The intent is real. But twelve months on, the pattern of work has barely moved.
Directorate leadership meetings still reward polished updates over honest problem-raising. Nobody has time for the questions that would be most useful, because the agenda is already overloaded with formal reporting. Managers are still avoiding difficult conversations because the HR process feels slow, uncertain and poorly supported. Staff still escalate routine decisions because local authority is genuinely unclear, and the cost of getting something wrong is more visible than the cost of escalating.
Cross-council collaboration is praised in the values framework. But when two services would need to share resource to work together, neither director moves first. And when it comes to promotion, the leaders who have delivered visible results within their own service have fared better than those who invested in joint work that is harder to attribute.
The values say "one council." The signals say something different.
The organisation has not asked staff to be dishonest. It has asked them to perform a new identity while still working inside the conditions that shaped the old one.
Four practical moves
These are not a culture programme. They are diagnostic moves for leaders who want to understand the gap between what is declared and what is reinforced.
Read the shadow scorecard
What actually earns praise, protection and promotion in this organisation? Look at recent decisions: which projects were defended under budget pressure, which managers were publicly supported when things went wrong, who was promoted and why. This surfaces the unofficial culture that staff are learning from, alongside the official one.
The point is not to find fault. It is to see what the organisation is genuinely teaching people.
Redesign the routines that carry the old behaviour
Choose two or three routines where the old culture is repeatedly produced: a senior meeting, a performance conversation, a promotion decision, an escalation process. Ask what would need to change in that routine for the declared value to become visible in ordinary work. Each value should be linkable to a leadership habit, a management action and a visible consequence. If you cannot name any of those, the value has not yet been designed into the work.
Find where the value becomes costly
Ask managers and staff to describe a recent moment when acting on the declared values became genuinely difficult. Where did collaboration create a problem rather than solve one? Where did raising a concern go nowhere? Where did accountability feel too risky to claim? Ask also whether managers have the time, authority and organisational backing to support the new behaviour when delivery pressure rises, because culture work becomes performative when people are asked to sustain new behaviours without the conditions to support them.
These moments locate the friction between declared and reinforced culture. They reveal where the design work needs to focus.
Check what is being tolerated
Culture is not only what the organisation rewards. It is also what it steps over. Which behaviours, consistently, go without comment? Which problems reappear in every survey but stay unaddressed? What do managers routinely absorb rather than name?
Tolerance is not neutral. It teaches people what is actually acceptable, regardless of what the values framework says.
What changes culture
A values campaign can do something useful. It can name intent, start a conversation and signal that the organisation is taking something seriously. What it cannot do, on its own, is change what people experience as normal, safe and expected in daily work.
Culture becomes real when people learn, through ordinary experience, that the new behaviour will still be supported when it becomes difficult. That learning does not happen at a launch event. It happens in the meeting where a difficult question is welcomed rather than deflected. The performance conversation that is honest rather than careful. The promotion decision that reflects the values the organisation says it holds.
The question is not whether people heard the new values. It is whether the organisation has changed what it makes easier, safer and more worthwhile to do.
At Common Path Connection, we help leaders look beneath the language of culture to the routines, signals and conditions shaping how work actually happens.
Our Culture & Ways of Working support helps organisations identify the gap between declared and reinforced culture, and turn that insight into practical moves that hold.
Our Culture Health Check is a starting point for teams that want to understand what staff are genuinely learning from the way work is organised.
Comments